<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time enough for tweets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iangarrickmason.com/2009/03/time-enough-for-tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iangarrickmason.com/2009/03/time-enough-for-tweets/</link>
	<description>A miscellany on politics and culture by Ian Garrick Mason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:43:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Garrick Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.iangarrickmason.com/2009/03/time-enough-for-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Garrick Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iangarrickmason.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Nicely put!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely put!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://www.iangarrickmason.com/2009/03/time-enough-for-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iangarrickmason.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-53</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re quite right—us old fogies ( i.e. anyone over 35) got distracted just fine before Twitter and email thank you very much! ;) I think one thing that has changed—and what you write here points to it—is that we now have higher standards for what we give our attention to. It&#039;s not that we can&#039;t sit and read the paper from beginning to end, it&#039;s just not necessarily the best use of our time and energy. We demand more quality and quantity because we know it&#039;s out there.

Well, since you&#039;re not on Twitter I tweeted this. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re quite right—us old fogies ( i.e. anyone over 35) got distracted just fine before Twitter and email thank you very much! <img src='http://www.iangarrickmason.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I think one thing that has changed—and what you write here points to it—is that we now have higher standards for what we give our attention to. It&#8217;s not that we can&#8217;t sit and read the paper from beginning to end, it&#8217;s just not necessarily the best use of our time and energy. We demand more quality and quantity because we know it&#8217;s out there.</p>
<p>Well, since you&#8217;re not on Twitter I tweeted this. <img src='http://www.iangarrickmason.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

